Monday, September 7, 2009

War

Have you ever thought what the purpose of a war is? To phrase it differently whom does a war benefit? Does it in any real way benefit the solder fighting on the ground, who is so convinced that he is fighting for a greater cause which is a reflection of the aspirations of its people that he is ready to die for it?

My opinion on the above is that a war is only a cliché which is groomed by those few who proclaim themselves to be the leaders of a nation. They induce the rest to believe that the cause they are fighting for is their own, that it is necessary therefore that they must join in, for not doing so would be unpatriotic. The only real and material benefit of this war is however that the so called leaders get a few more acres of land to rule over, in exchange for say a couple of thousand lives. Such is the rhetoric that is made up through speeches and supported by a large section of the press (getting a good sum of money from weapon dealers) that we are again induced to believe that the portion of land that we have got is worth every life lost, maybe even more, we are made to believe that it is we that have gained that land as if an addition to the property we are in our individual capacity holding.

How deceitful all the above is. For in reality the soldier who has died or those who have lived to see the after war would soon realize that there is nothing for them in that victory. There household still looks the same, their financial condition has not improved, and that magical piece of land for which all that fighting was done has bared no fruits for them. On the other hand in order to support the war extra financial burden was placed on the households through various taxes; money for development was deployed for purchasing arms and ammunitions. What good is such a war for that soldier? Or in fact the people whose aspirations he thinks he is representing.

There is no gain in war, except for those at the highest echelons of fascist politics and the producers of arms and ammunitions. If only all were to understand this, not be very motivated to fight for it. Then perhaps the money spent on those wars could be constructively utilized for feeding the millions starving to death in many parts of the world. We would have no massacres, no mothers and children having to abandon their homes in the middle of the night. If only all of us were to see through, if only for our own good. But then they say common sense is not so common.

13 comments:

  1. Yes, I've thought about this so many times, but of course, that's what I was brought up to believe: pacifist/idealist/liberalist views. If the whole world adhered to pacifism, it would be an amazing place...too bad human nature sucks...

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...and humans are too weak, and thus allow themselves to be controlled by those in power.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lynnelle @ aren't the people in power humans ???

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, that's what I'm saying: human nature is corrupt, as well as, weak (among other things). So some people fall in the first category, some people fall in the second category, most people fall into both and few people fall into neither category.

    In other words, in terms of war, there are two main groups. In the first group, there are people who are so greedy that they are willing to sacrifice others (in war) to further their own self interest. In the second group, there are people who allow themselves to be manipulated and used as the soldiers who actually do the fighting (and dying) in wars. (You rarely see those in the first group, aka the ones that planned the war, on the front lines, they are usually safe behind their desks.)

    And that is how war happens...well, at least a very simplified view of it, in my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
  5. TRUE... left with no words except to agree agree agree!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lynnelle @ i have been thinking, why is the human nature so flawed ??? why so weak and corrupt ???

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have no idea...if you believe in evolution maybe it's because we have evolved this way in order to survive (well the corrupt have thrived, and the weak die off...) or maybe it's just "sin" …. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lynnelle @ give me sometime, don't think i have my views clear on it, i shall write as soon as clarity strikes.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One aspect of Human nature from my research and understanding so far is this...there is no such thing as "no alternative". Leaders and propagandists use such words to demoralize people. Human beings have survived so long because there have always been "ways" out of problems. Also while there is war, there are those who oppose it. Throughout history there have been more than one sides to the coin and I really don't think all of humanity is to be condemned for the inability of some and the conscious effort by some to destroy and confuse, for there will always be those who are not afraid of the light.

    ReplyDelete
  10. surkhi @ true very true, there are always those who are wiling to stand and fight not for their own selfish little cause but for something wider, but i would add that the instances of them being at the helm of affairs and being able to have their say are rare... but you still could draw inspiration from them.

    and even though human being have survived, is it because their were brave sould who fought for it, or were the selfish's one not bothered enough to really destroy the race. without denyng the excistence of the former and giving due respect to their effort, i still think it's the latter reason.

    from my understanding of the notions challenging our age, across the world, i see the rein of those who are more hell bent on destruction by creating confusion.

    ReplyDelete
  11. At any point anyone could be reining over the world and it doesn't mean the tide won't turn. I agree that today it is the rein of the hypocrits...what shall one do, is the question.

    ReplyDelete